F150 Lightning
08-08-2021, 02:30 PM
#1271
That's what per capita is.
Spreading fake news with no sources and calling people names instead of admitting you are wrong isn't helping your cause bro
The following users liked this post:
pete7713 (08-17-2021)
08-08-2021, 02:33 PM
#1272
PNNL (Pacific Northwest National Labs), hope this helps, spend a couple of seconds and look it up.
08-08-2021, 02:33 PM
#1273
My source:
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rebecca...h=40d9f9381aad
"The biggest? Naturally Texas, where residents consumed a whopping 13 quadrillion BTUs in 2015. On a per capita basis, the state only ranks sixth."
Source please
Link to plan?
https://www.forbes.com/sites/rebecca...h=40d9f9381aad
"The biggest? Naturally Texas, where residents consumed a whopping 13 quadrillion BTUs in 2015. On a per capita basis, the state only ranks sixth."
Source please
Link to plan?
08-08-2021, 02:38 PM
#1274
08-08-2021, 02:42 PM
#1275
Senior Member
The following users liked this post:
blkZ28spt (08-08-2021)
08-08-2021, 02:43 PM
#1276
I did. Here's a link for others.
https://www.pnnl.gov/sites/default/f...ACTS_final.pdf
Did you notice the part where they said the limit raises to 65M with managed charging without any charges to the current grid capacity?
Major Findings
2028 resource adequacy is likely to be sufficient for high EV penetration assumption.
Under a high-penetration scenario with national electric fleets of ~24 million LDVs, 200,000 MDVs, 150,000 HDVs for a 2028 time frame, we are not expecting resource adequacy issues in the WECC under normal operating conditions (normal system, weather, and water conditions). The corresponding electric fleet sizes for the WECC footprint are 9 million LDVs, 70,000 MDVs and 94 HDV charging stations.
EV resource adequacy can be doubled with managed charging strategies.
The EV resource adequacy for the entire WECC interconnection was estimated for a likely unmanaged charging scenario under which most LDVs were charging at home starting in the evening (Home High power No Delay: HHND). Unmanaged charging is predicated on arrival time at home in the evening, when we assumed that the charging process begins. The vi maximum number of LDVs when projected to the national fleet was about 30 million (national value) or 9 million for the WECC footprint. Alternatively, if managed charging was applied by hypothesizing a price-minimization scheme, the EV resource adequacy could be expanded to 65 million (national fleet number) or 19.6 million for the WECC. This suggests a significant opportunity to substitute additional generation and transmission requirements with smart charging strategies and much better utilization of the existing grid.
2028 resource adequacy is likely to be sufficient for high EV penetration assumption.
Under a high-penetration scenario with national electric fleets of ~24 million LDVs, 200,000 MDVs, 150,000 HDVs for a 2028 time frame, we are not expecting resource adequacy issues in the WECC under normal operating conditions (normal system, weather, and water conditions). The corresponding electric fleet sizes for the WECC footprint are 9 million LDVs, 70,000 MDVs and 94 HDV charging stations.
EV resource adequacy can be doubled with managed charging strategies.
The EV resource adequacy for the entire WECC interconnection was estimated for a likely unmanaged charging scenario under which most LDVs were charging at home starting in the evening (Home High power No Delay: HHND). Unmanaged charging is predicated on arrival time at home in the evening, when we assumed that the charging process begins. The vi maximum number of LDVs when projected to the national fleet was about 30 million (national value) or 9 million for the WECC footprint. Alternatively, if managed charging was applied by hypothesizing a price-minimization scheme, the EV resource adequacy could be expanded to 65 million (national fleet number) or 19.6 million for the WECC. This suggests a significant opportunity to substitute additional generation and transmission requirements with smart charging strategies and much better utilization of the existing grid.
The following users liked this post:
blkZ28spt (08-08-2021)
08-08-2021, 02:44 PM
#1277
PNNL says, and I quote
https://www.pnnl.gov/sites/default/f...ACTS_final.pdf
"Major Findings 2028 resource adequacy is likely to be sufficient for high EV penetration assumption. • Under a high-penetration scenario with national electric fleets of ~24 million LDVs, 200,000 MDVs, 150,000 HDVs for a 2028 time frame, we are not expecting resource adequacy issues in the WECC under normal operating conditions"
Thank you for pointing me to a source that says we will have enough electrical generation to support huge numbers of future EV's
But wait, there's more!
"EV resource adequacy can be doubled with managed charging strategies. The EV resource adequacy for the entire WECC interconnection was estimated for a likely unmanaged charging scenario under which most LDVs were charging at home starting in the evening (Home High power No Delay: HHND). Unmanaged charging is predicated on arrival time at home in the evening, when we assumed that the charging process begins. The vi maximum number of LDVs when projected to the national fleet was about 30 million (national value) or 9 million for the WECC footprint. Alternatively, if managed charging was applied by hypothesizing a price-minimization scheme, the EV resource adequacy could be expanded to 65 million (national fleet number) or 19.6 million for the WECC."
There you have it, a simple process and merely 7 years from now they say we can support 65 million EVs when we only have 1.8 million right now.
It's time to crank out epic numbers of EVs, according to your claims.
Let's get on it!
The following users liked this post:
jkoravos (08-08-2021)
The following users liked this post:
blkZ28spt (08-08-2021)
08-08-2021, 03:06 PM
#1279
Senior Member
Well, I've had two cups of coffee now, Mr. Paw has posted 10 more times, and I still have no clue what point he's trying to make. 
Do you like the Lightning or not?
Do you like the Lightning or not?
The following 5 users liked this post by dalola:
blkZ28spt (08-08-2021),
pete7713 (08-17-2021),
Ricktwuhk (08-08-2021),
Xspurt (08-08-2021),
[F2C]MaDMaXX (08-08-2021)