Topic Sponsor
2021+ Ford F150 Discussion of the 14th generation F150.
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

F150 Lightning

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-24-2021, 10:51 AM
  #551  
Senior Member
 
hellb0y's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2020
Posts: 314
Received 48 Likes on 42 Posts
Default

The Pro will have really cheap materials inside, 8in screen and a few things will be optional - good value for people that can live without some modern features…
hellb0y is offline  
Old 05-24-2021, 11:20 AM
  #552  
Senior Member
 
Xspurt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: North of Charlotte, NC
Posts: 351
Received 240 Likes on 127 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vulnox
It's better equipped than I expected. Someone, I think jokingly, said it may have crank windows and that, because the price gap to XLT is pretty large. It seems pretty close though, although I suspect it's down a lot to interior materials and that. I know there is a big difference in getting the 2.4KW ProPower, but at least in the gas F-150, it's only about $700 to move up to 7.2KW, so I don't think that explains it. Hopefully we will see more detailed comparison.
Not just crank windows but the crank itself will power mini-generators that put energy back in the battery. You might even be able to go 5mph on the shoulder of I70 in western Kansas with 4 people continuously cranking the windows up and down! No, I'm not hating on it, I'm all for this but I knew the low price Ford was touting would be a truck that nobody would want because of how stripped it would be. Just be sure to take everything with a grain of salt. I'm talking not your ionized (a necessary nutrient) table salt grain, I'm talking that rock salt they spread on the roads in the northeast. It will cost more than the ads say, it will go less miles than what the ads say, etc.
Xspurt is offline  
Old 05-24-2021, 11:42 AM
  #553  
Member
 
BLoflin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Texas
Posts: 44
Received 32 Likes on 15 Posts
Default

King Ranch trim started (way back) as a semi-location specific trim (i.e. popular in the Southwest, then spreading). Even now if you search a location (say zipcodes in Texas versus zipcodes in NE) you would see much more KR in inventory (back when dealers used to have inventory!). My personal opinion, is Ford is starting initial Lightning configs (trims and options) smaller, to make it simpler, and will add/adjust moving forward in future Model Years as demand and customer inputs come.

Given that Ford just now (this year) has announced a KR trim for Explorer, tells me that KR will be around for a long time.
BLoflin is offline  
The following users liked this post:
150finallygot1 (05-24-2021)
Old 05-24-2021, 11:48 AM
  #554  
Senior Member
 
SHO4CY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: IOWA
Posts: 749
Received 195 Likes on 158 Posts

Default

There is no Limited trim either.

As another post mentioned, I think they are just initially trying to cover the general spectrum:
Pro, XLT, Lariat, Platinum
as compared to
XL, XLT, Tremor, Lariat, King Ranch, Platinum, Limited
SHO4CY is offline  
The following users liked this post:
150finallygot1 (05-24-2021)
Old 05-24-2021, 12:17 PM
  #555  
Member
 
Slappy McGee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 96
Received 90 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by b-real
GM will have a new interior for 2022. They are definitely way behind Ford and Ram right now, but Ford was also way behind Ram until the 2021 redesign.
They're in dire need of an update. I sat in a neighbor's new Yukon Denali and it's really nice, so apparently GM does know how to make a good interior. I did shop the Silverados/GMC and really like the GMC AT4 exterior, but the interior is totally "blah" at best, and really behind with the tiny screen and lack of tech.
Slappy McGee is offline  
The following users liked this post:
VectorZ (05-24-2021)
Old 05-24-2021, 12:20 PM
  #556  
Member
 
Slappy McGee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2021
Posts: 96
Received 90 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flamingtaco
The US average time at a pump is 4.5 minutes. If you need just 15 minutes at a charger, you still need over 3x the number of charging spots Vs pumps at any given fuel station. Charging stations near restaurants by highways would take a burden from limited fuel station acreage, provide a means to continue to use chargers as they become legacy, and provide an option to always using the fastest charge rate while on the road.
Although theoretically you do take some significant percentage of that volume away from the public fuel station, and transition that to people charging in their home or apartment building. I haven't seen any predictions but that could potentially flatten or even create an overall reduction in the need for public charging stations.

I kind of wonder if we might see the return of the "station attendant." To optimze charging maybe you toss you're keys to the attendant, go in for your pee/coffee/lunch and he/she wrangles various cars through the charging station to optimize throughput.

I've got to imagine (or maybe I'm just hoping) that companies like Sheetz, Circle K, QT, etc., that jazzed up the "grungy gas station with bad food and a bathroom from a horror movie" concept are thinking through some cool stuff.
Slappy McGee is offline  
Old 05-24-2021, 12:42 PM
  #557  
Senior Member
 
N4HHE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 1,553
Received 617 Likes on 406 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by babock
A savvy buyer wouldn't pay cash.
Ditto. A while back I purchased a new Tesla with 1.49% financing. With 2% inflation I paid the loan with money worth less than what I borrowed.

Expect 10% inflation the next couple years. Its already 4.8%. "Smart money" is borrowing every penny one can, buying bigger houses now. Get something real now, pay for it later with artificial money.
N4HHE is offline  
Old 05-24-2021, 12:47 PM
  #558  
2023 F150 Tremor 3.5L
iTrader: (1)
 
b-real's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 1,618
Received 552 Likes on 401 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Slappy McGee
I've got to imagine (or maybe I'm just hoping) that companies like Sheetz, Circle K, QT, etc., that jazzed up the "grungy gas station with bad food and a bathroom from a horror movie" concept are thinking through some cool stuff.
Only if they can conceive of a way to make money from it
b-real is offline  
Old 05-24-2021, 12:50 PM
  #559  
Senior Member
 
N4HHE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 1,553
Received 617 Likes on 406 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dmd
An EV truck would not fit my needs as we do 1000 miles in a day a few times a year, on occasion pulling a good sized TT. With the TT we go 3/4 in one day then finish the next AM. Now a plug-in hybrid that can tow and haul well might be of interest, problem is that the extra weight of the battery and such might decrease payload.
So what is your problem? Today's F-150 is the size and capacity of the F-250 30 years ago.

Your fearsome battery is nothing a little bit of stiffer suspension and bigger brakes can not handle.

Quit worrying about how the solution is reached, look at what is being accomplished. You act as if once you heard "batteries" you know everything there is to know about hybrids. Ford says versions of the PowerBoost can tow 11,000 pounds. Fine. Quit worrying about how it is done and ask how much fuel is required to pull your trailer at the max 65 MPH your trailer tires are rated. That is the real question, whether an EcoBoost, PowerBoost, Lightning, or Powerstroke is going to get you from here to there at lowest cost.
N4HHE is offline  
The following users liked this post:
7cbreeze (05-24-2021)
Old 05-24-2021, 01:16 PM
  #560  
Senior Member
 
N4HHE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Madison, AL
Posts: 1,553
Received 617 Likes on 406 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Flamingtaco
The US average time at a pump is 4.5 minutes. If you need just 15 minutes at a charger, you still need over 3x the number of charging spots Vs pumps at any given fuel station. Charging stations near restaurants by highways would take a burden from limited fuel station acreage, provide a means to continue to use chargers as they become legacy, and provide an option to always using the fastest charge rate while on the road.
You are suffering from limited thinking in believing "Gas truck needs gas stations therefore EV truck needs gas stations!"

The EV starts every morning with a "full tank" (or whatever you decide to charge the battery to). The only time it ever needs a "gas station" is when you come near the range of the battery.

So by your own statistics you are wasting 4.5 minutes (Really? You can detour to a gas station in only 5 minutes? Then pump gas for 4.5 minutes? The traffic lights at nearby gas stations take 4 minutes to cycle.) to fill the gas tank when if you had an EV you would be spending an extra 15 seconds each morning, 15 seconds each night, moving the EVSE umbilical 3' toward the EV at night and then 3' away in the morning.

Long 67 second video. After washing my Tesla the last 15 seconds I go into the garage for the charging umbilical and plug it in: Ring Video: Charge Tesla
N4HHE is offline  


Quick Reply: F150 Lightning



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:45 PM.